Adviser to the Chairman of the Supreme Court reveals all the behind-the-scenes secrets of the Main...

Source: www.rucriminal.info

Last week, the legal community shuddered at the widespread mail archive of the “fixer” under the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation V.M. Lebedev. – 30-year-old Stanislav Fedorov, whose candidacy was so carelessly recommended by the Higher Qualification Commission of the Russian Federation on November 24, 2023.

The circumstances of his passing the qualification exam and receiving a recommendation from the Higher Qualification Committee of the Russian Federation, which his postal archive reveals, deserve special attention.

If we talk about characteristics, it is noteworthy that the characteristics for the Higher Qualification Court of the Russian Federation for the recently appointed judge of the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation R.A. Ryabzin. (former employee of the Secretariat of the RF Armed Forces) and S.I. Fedorov. signed by Lebedev V.M. textually coincide 100%, which once again shows that the elderly Lebedev V.M. does not even read the documents he signs (Doc 1, Doc 2).

Recommendation by Fedorov S.I. received in a very short time:

- October 25-26, 2023 – passing the exam;

- November 8, 2023 — completion of the competition;

- November 24, 2023 receiving a recommendation.

This means that in fact no one carried out any checks against the candidate (the average check period is 4-6 months) and speaks of an extremely unusual approach on the part of the High Qualification Board of Judges of the Russian Federation, but rather of direct abuse on the part of the head of the High Qualifications Committee of the Russian Federation — Timoshin N.V.

Moreover, at the last moment the issue of his recommendation was included not in the main, but in the additional agenda of the board meeting.

It is also noteworthy how the chicks of Lebedev V.M. pass the qualification exam for the position of judge. Thus, in the distributed postal archive there is a letter from Lidia Ageeva, Deputy Chairman of the Examination Commission of the Qualification Board of Judges of Moscow, Deputy Chairman of the Moscow Arbitration Court, sent from the personal mail of L.N. Ageeva. Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра. to the personal mailbox of Fedorov S.I.

In this letter Ageeva L.N. with reference to a certain N.A. sends a prepared written assignment and judicial practice to pass the qualifying exam. Subsequently, the letter is sent to another employee of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation — A. Isaev, to whom the completed written task is also sent.

In the properties of the sent files, the author of the file is visible — Olga Sergeevna Bibina (assistant to L.N. Ageeva) and L.N. Ageeva directly, and the place where the file was created is the Moscow Arbitration Court.

Similarly, in Fedorov’s mail for the same date there is a letter on behalf of Yulia Vladimirovna Arkhipova,

a judge of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District. Like Ageeva L.N., Arkhipova Yu.V. worked as a governess-tutor for Fedorov S.I., preparing a written assignment for him, answers to questions and sending from her personal mailing address Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра. to the work address of Ryabzin R.A. Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра..(Doc 1, Doc 2)

In the properties of the sent files, the author of the file is Yulia Vladimirovna Arkhipova, and the place where the file was created is the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District.

Thus, the next revealed episode in the life of S. Fedorov is the falsification of exam results — the candidate came to the exam with 100% understanding of which ticket he would “pull”, with pre-prepared answers to questions and a solution to the problem that he supposedly “had” to solve (when passing the qualification exam, oral answers to questions and completion of a written task are expected — preparation of a judicial act).

What are the reasons for such connivance on the part of Lebedev V.M.?

Analysis of the correspondence of Fedorov S.I. answers this question and how and why a young man who had never worked as a judge earned the opportunity to become the head of one of the key courts of the Russian Federation — the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region.

Analysis of S.I. Fedorov, declassified due to inaccuracy. official documentation shows the role of Fedorov S.I. in exile from the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation O.M. Sviridenko, his assistants D.V. Tafintseva. and Vorobyova O.A.

Thus, a significant amount of official information is devoted to certificates regarding O.M. Sviridenko. about the allegedly unsatisfactory results of work personally by O.M. Sviridenko. and his staff (Tafintseva D.V., Vorobyeva O.A.), violation of procedural deadlines, issuance of obviously illegal judicial acts, conflict of interests and lobbying the interests of a number of business entities.

It also turns out that it was Fedorov S.I. coordinated the expulsion from the judicial system of the former Chairman of the Moscow City Court O.A. Egorova, collecting negative and compromising O.A. Egorova on a daily basis. information, constantly interacting with the leadership of the First Court of Appeal and the Second Court of Cassation, editing certificates and characteristics about the unsatisfactory work of the Moscow City Court and its Chairman.

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info